Re: Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?

Discussion in 'Virus Information' started by Dustin Cook, Apr 29, 2010.

  1. Dustin Cook

    James Egan Guest


    Oh, sorry!. Way too deep for me. Not the first time he's done that
    though.


    Jim :)
     
    James Egan, May 12, 2010
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. Dustin Cook

    Max Wachtel Guest

    BD got himself banned for the image in question. Most of the forums I
    frequent would not have allowed it either.
    --
    This post was created using Opera: http://www.opera.com
    Virus Removal Instructions
    http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home
    Max's Favorite Freeware
    http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware
    I am Max Wachtel and I approve this message.
     
    Max Wachtel, May 13, 2010
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. Dustin Cook

    Jenn Guest

    I'm aware of all that... no one can tell me what about that image makes it
    sexually oriented. At what point does any image qualify as being sexually
    oriented? Is it at the point it gets someone aroused? If that is true,
    other images should be disallowed, too. Also, what about the image was
    "vulgar"?? Do tell? I'd like an explanation.

    Thus far, you and others have labeled the image as both vulgar and sexually
    oriented so it was unsuitable for malwarebytes forum, yet NO ONE will
    explain at what point an image becomes, either. It sounds like some
    ambiguous determination based on a conclusion written on the wind.

    So .. answer my questions above. If no one can answer then, the only
    conclusions is that the image can't be either vulgar or sexually oriented.
     
    Jenn, May 13, 2010
    #43
  4. Dustin Cook

    Jenn Guest

    The entire scenario is subjective ... sooo.. since some people believe one
    particular image is sexually oriented and it was justified to be removed...
    I'd like to know what about the image qualified it to be sexually oriented.
     
    Jenn, May 14, 2010
    #44
  5. The image is vulgar, and you're a moron.
     
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, May 14, 2010
    #45
  6. It's a nice parable, but please be careful not to bust the BI.
     
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, May 14, 2010
    #46
  7. Dustin Cook

    Jenn Guest

    By who's definition? No one can say, or is willing to say what makes the
    image either vulgar or sexually oriented. We don't live in Victorian times,
    so what used to be vulgar is not anymore. It would seem that some people
    have become prudes, which is quite surprising in this day we live in.

    Now.. define when an image becomes vulgar or sexually oriented. As adults,
    is this such a difficult thing to do?
     
    Jenn, May 14, 2010
    #47
  8. Dustin Cook

    Jenn Guest

    oh please, jd ... if you can't explain to anyone how you define what is
    vulgar or sexually oriented, how can you expect there to be any standard to
    judge an image?
     
    Jenn, May 14, 2010
    #48
  9. **** off and die.
     
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, May 14, 2010
    #49
  10. Dustin Cook

    Jenn Guest

    Interesting response.. are you a teen ager? I'm guessing 14 yrs old?
     
    Jenn, May 14, 2010
    #50
  11. From: "Jenn" <>


    | Interesting response.. are you a teen ager? I'm guessing 14 yrs old?

    She's an adult and you are acting like a teenager.

    The content of the picture is unquestionably sexually oriented by US standards.

    Test: Can you see that picture unobfuscated on a US television broadcast channel ?
    Answer: no

    /* Now stop trolling ! */
     
    David H. Lipman, May 14, 2010
    #51
  12. Dustin Cook

    Jenn Guest

    No it's not ...
    The web is not US television. People keep saying the image is 1. sexually
    oriented, and 2. vulgar.
    ........ define, if you can, at what point does any image become *sexually
    oriented*.

    You won't do it, nor will anyone else do it because it's a subjective
    conclusion.
     
    Jenn, May 14, 2010
    #52
  13. Dustin Cook

    Max Wachtel Guest

    The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and his
    opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that the pic was
    unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of story.
    --
    This post was created using Opera: http://www.opera.com
    Virus Removal Instructions
    http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home
    Max's Favorite Freeware
    http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware
    I am Max Wachtel and I approve this message.
     
    Max Wachtel, May 15, 2010
    #53
  14. This is an exceptionally complex concept--one too involved for her tiny
    little brain to comprehend.

    And she's a lousy troll, to boot.
     
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, May 15, 2010
    #54
  15. Dustin Cook

    Max Wachtel Guest

    I'll try to use small words.
    --
    This post was created using Opera: http://www.opera.com
    Virus Removal Instructions
    http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home
    Max's Favorite Freeware
    http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware
    I am Max Wachtel and I approve this message.
     
    Max Wachtel, May 15, 2010
    #55
  16. From: "Max Wachtel" <>

    | The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and his
    | opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that the pic was
    | unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of story.


    No, he received no warning. After the 1st post with the attached graphic, the post was
    removed. After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned.
     
    David H. Lipman, May 15, 2010
    #56
  17. Dustin Cook

    ~BD~ Guest

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net>
    Newsgroups:
    alt.privacy.spyware,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.virus,microsoft.public.security.virus
    Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 4:21 AM
    Subject: Re: Is MBAM a 100% safe application?

    Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning.
    When I checked to make sure it was there - it wasn't. I know full well
    that
    things go awry when computing, so I simply re-posted the image NOT
    intending
    to cause offense - it was meant to be a bit of fun!
    Indeed I was. A silly fit of pique in my opinion - unless there is more
    to
    this incident than meets the eye.

    A question for David Lipman - please advise - just *how* do you know
    that
    this is an accurate picture of what happened? Dustin Cook ( a
    Malwarebytes
    employee?) said a while ago, incorrectly, that a warning *was* issued!
    Folk
    reading here need to know whose word they can trust!
     
    ~BD~, May 15, 2010
    #57
  18. From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@nospam~@hotmail.co.uk>


    | ----- Original Message -----
    | From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net>
    | Newsgroups:
    | alt.privacy.spyware,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.virus,microsoft.public.security.virus
    | Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 4:21 AM
    | Subject: Re: Is MBAM a 100% safe application?


    | Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning.

    | When I checked to make sure it was there - it wasn't. I know full well
    | that
    | things go awry when computing, so I simply re-posted the image NOT
    | intending
    | to cause offense - it was meant to be a bit of fun!

    | Indeed I was. A silly fit of pique in my opinion - unless there is more
    | to
    | this incident than meets the eye.

    | A question for David Lipman - please advise - just *how* do you know
    | that
    | this is an accurate picture of what happened? Dustin Cook ( a
    | Malwarebytes
    | employee?) said a while ago, incorrectly, that a warning *was* issued!
    | Folk
    | reading here need to know whose word they can trust!


    People know they can't trust YOU !~

    It doesn't matter the content of the picture and it doesn't matter that you didn't receive
    a warning.

    Both are moot points just READ the AUP/ToS that YOU agreed to. Nothing in there states
    about and form of warning.

    All that matters is that you violated the AUP/ToS you agreed to and thus you were ToS'd.

    End of Story !
     
    David H. Lipman, May 15, 2010
    #58
  19. For a normally intelligent person, the removal of the post would be warning
    enough.
    He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
     
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, May 15, 2010
    #59
  20. From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <>


    | For a normally intelligent person, the removal of the post would be warning
    | enough.

    | He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

    Not even an 'edge'.
     
    David H. Lipman, May 15, 2010
    #60
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.